Justpeace Education for
Children and Youth
Organized by: Center
for Justpeace in Asia and the Interfaith Cooperation Forum
Hosted by: Henry
Martyn Institute, Hyderabad India
November 27 - 30, 2005
Conflict and violence touch the lives of children throughout Asia on a daily basis. The violence may be in the form of war, poverty, racism or exclusion. Whatever the form, children are deeply affected by it and their futures are influenced by how they learn to deal with the realities of this conflict and violence. At the same time children, even very young ones, have far more ability to be involved in social change than most people recognize.
The Justpeace Education for Children and Youth workshop aims to assess the need for bringing interfaith peace and justice learning into schools in Asia and to map out a process for developing curriculum and/or a resource kit for peace education that can be used at various levels in schools.
Day 1: Hearing each others stories
Day 2: Exposure and more stories
Day 3: Principles of Justpeace Education
Day 4: Workshop Outcomes
Day
1: Hearing each others
stories
Sharing
from Palestine, Nepal, India – Rafiki, Philippines, South Africa, India
– HMI
The
opening day of the workshop started with an interfaith prayer lead by
Shanaz, Madhavi, and Phebe. After a brief welcome to the Henry Martyn
Institute by its director, Andreas D’Souza, Max Ediger set the framework
for the workshop with his opening presentation in which he addressed the
reality of children in conflict areas, the concept of justpeace, and the
expected outcomes for the workshop. Much discussion was generated on the
differing perceptions of justice in this world.
In lieu of Ahmad Al’Azzeh’s presence, Max shared some of his
stories from a former trip to Palestine and also described some of the
Ahmad’s projects from information he had provided prior to the workshop.
Ahmad is working with Holy Land Trust, an organization that promotes the
integration of peacebuilding into Palestinian schools. Another specific
project highlighted in the material was the “Remember the Innocence
Club,” which is a multi-faith group of teenagers who mentor younger
children and foster the atmosphere of peace through games and activities.
Following
the Palestinian perspective Bishnu Pukar Shrestha, a former secondary
school teacher and current peace activist, shared about the situation in
Nepal, a country in the midst of armed conflict and insurgency. Bishnu
shared some alarming statistics from his country, among them school
dropout rates that approached 50% of the youth population. He also shared
some of the positive work groups are doing to promote peace and the rights
of children, including the idea of a “Children’s Parliament” used to
empower children and give them a voice in the context of national
decision-making.
In
contrast to the responses to physical violence evident in the armed
struggle of Nepal, Sunitha shared how her work with Rafiki, a
multi-cultural, lingual, and religious theatre group based out of
Bangalore (India), dealt with issues of structural violence through their
“Towards Making Rainbows” program. This program raises the issue of
diversity among students and encourages them to actively participate in
their own education through a technique called Forum theatre. Students are
invited to participate in dialogue over topics such as whether or not
building a wall is an appropriate solution to conflict. This presentation
generated discussion about involving children through creative means like
art, drama and story telling.
Next
Phebe Crismo spoke out of a Philippine context, which included both
elements of ethnic and religious diversity as well as a long history of
national insurgency and poverty. From this perspective she highlighted the
necessity of sensitivity towards cultural traits and norms in any form of
peace education so that trust can be built and sustained. Establishing
“Zones of Peace” and creating resource materials about the rights of
children were among the various ideas that she shared.
While
not from an Asian context, the group was happy to hear stories shared by
Anu Pillay, a South African of Indian descent studying in Hyderabad.
Through her stories it became quite clear that there are more similarities
internationally, than differences in terms of responses to conflict and
the positive involvement of children in justpeace education. Some of the
examples which exemplified the concepts of justpeace within the South
African context included buddy systems, child run health centers,
international school twinning programs.
The
day finished with a brief introduction to the work and programs of the
local teachers at the Aman Shanti Centre and other HMI run projects in
Hyderabad. These community-based programs work at bringing together the
Muslim and Hindu communities in Hyderabad through the establishment of
community schools, local income generation and skill building programs,
and community health clinics.
Day
2: Exposure and more stories
Exposure
to Aman Shanti Centre, Sharing from Sri Lanka, Malaysia
After
participating in an interfaith worship/mediation with HMI staff and
students, workshop participants visited Aman Shanti Centre for an exposure
trip. At the centre participants saw first hand the impact of justpeace
principles within the community through the work of a health clinic, a
primary school and skill building classes like embroidery and sewing.
Further discussion about the establishment of the centre revealed that
introducing the concepts of peace into a community is a long process that
requires much work, dedication, and involvement. This long-term and
intentional participation was exemplified through early visits from HMI
staff and teachers to members of the community, arranged in order to
understand the needs of the neighbourhood and build confidence in each
other and in the work of the centre, and continues through parent teacher
meetings and community peace picnics. It was clear through this experience
that students learned the principles of peace through the example of their
teachers, who emulate these values as they positively work along side each
other regardless of their faith background, which is equally distributed
between Hindu and Muslim at the centre.
In the afternoon, Marliya Izzadeen shared about the Sri Lankan
experience. Marliya gave a brief history of Sri Lanka and explained how
the root causes of conflict can be confounded and often misrepresented as
religious instead of ethnic or vice versa. In this discussion, it was
important to note that strategies for peace education are dependent on the
context and must be adapted to the specific situation. Many NGO’s in Sri
Lanka are working on children’s rights. One such program is the
“Lilies of the Field” which brings children together in small support
groups.
Shazeera Ahmad Zawawi, from the Human Right Commission of Malaysia,
was the last to share about different regional experiences. She shared
examples of activities used to promote human rights and peace education in
Malaysia. Based on the example of publishing a regular column about human
rights in a local newspaper, she challenged participants to look at ways
of using local media sources to spread the concepts of justpeace beyond
the classroom. Training of young trainers, human rights camps, school
talks and poster/art competitions were among some of the other activities
that were used within the Malaysian experience.
Day
3: Principles of Justpeace
Education
Discussion
of learning in small working groups
In
small groups participants formulated principles for Justpeace Education by
connecting their own experiences and lessons learned to the sharing of the
group from the previous two days. The following principles are meant to
serve as a guideline for future Justpeace Education work.
Justpeace
education must be rooted in the Convention of the Rights of the Child and
all other related international conventions.
Justpeace
education must use local resources, people and wisdom in order to be
sustainable. Programs and resources must be sensitive to the local culture
and be accessible to and involve all members of the community, through
addressing the target group’s characteristics, understandings and needs:
language, age, religion, education level, etc. Justpeace education must
start at the grassroots and move towards national transformation.
Justpeace
education recognizes that every situation is different and requires
different responses. Creativity, persistence, patience and flexibility are
invaluable qualities, in light of minimal resources and opposing
attitudes. Set models for justpeace education are not always applicable
in every situation. Justpeace education is a long and continuing process.
Justpeace
education must provide a safe space for people to voice their needs and
express their feelings, and thus create an environment of mutual respect
and empowerment within the wonderful diversity of human life.
Representation of different faith, gender, and ethnic communities, in the
context of interfaith work, is essential.
Justpeace education must be aware of appropriate terminology, and use inclusive language.
Justpeace educators not only facilitate the exchange of information, but also model the concept of justpeace through their lives and interactions. Every person has the capacity to teach and to learn. Justpeace education is the responsibility of all people.
Justpeace educators must acknowledge their personal limitations and identify appropriate networks that can be called upon to handle situations that emerge from justpeace education in order to support the physical, social, and emotional needs of children, youth and staff as necessary.
Justpeace educators must avoid judging violent responses to oppression. Understanding violent conflict does not mean that the violence is justified. Rather, educators must work together with all involved parties and constantly seek non-violent and participatory alternatives to conflict.
Day
4: Workshop Outcomes
Small
group discussions
The
final day of the workshop evaluated the principles outlined from the
previous day and suggested concrete tools that would contribute to the
expansion of the Justpeace Education network and philosophy. These
outcomes are listed below:
Introductory
Brochure to Justpeace Education
The
creation of an introductory brochure about Justpeace education will help
people to explain and promote the principles of Justpeace to others within
their network. A brochure is necessary to help reach those communities who
do not have ready access to the Internet.
Justpeace
Education Resource Kit
The
creation of an electronic portal (website), also printed for distribution
in a loose-leaf binder format, will centralize information that already
exists about Justpeace education. One section will include descriptions of
activities, games, songs and other ideas that are being used to promote
the principles of Justpeace. Another section will list organizations that
are involved in various types of justpeace education. There will also be a
section of stories/case studies of justpeace education in action. Workshop
participants are expected to contribute to the content of this resource
kit. Information will be submitted electronically to the workshop email
group, justpeace_education@yahoogroups.com. The Interfaith Cooperation
Forum will initially host the electronic portal on the ICF website.
Expand
Justpeace Education Networks
It
was suggested that each of the workshop participants could work at
expanding the Justpeace education network locally and nationally by integrating
the concept of justpeace into our already existing activities, and by looking
for other groups/individuals with similar interests.
List of Participants
1) Marliya Izzadeen (Sri Lanka)
2)Bishnu Pukar Shrestha (Nepal)
3)Tony Waworuntu (Hong Kong)
4)Shazeera Ahmad Zawawi (Malaysia)
5)Phebe Gamata Crismo (Philippines)
6)Yip Kok Choong (Hong Kong)
7)Jahan Ara (India)
8)Madhavi Latha (India)
9)Shanaz Fatima (India)
10)Babitha (India)
11)Durdana (India)
12)Vani Soi (India)
13)Swapna (India)
14)Rajeswari (India)
15)Shailaja (India)
16)Human (India)
17)Mini Nair (India)
18)Sunitha (India)
19)Anu Pillay (India/South Africa)
20)Max Ediger (Hong Kong)
21)Trisha Niemeyer (Hong Kong)
1)Ms. A. Elga J. Sarapung (Indonesia)
2)Mary Selvarag (India)
3)Mr. Ahmad Al'Azzeh (Palestine)